Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-09-29 |
| 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 1.36 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M30s has a score of 83.3, which is a bit better than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G's overall score of 77. Samsung Galaxy M30s is a somewhat thicker and a little bit heavier cellphone than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. Both phones in this comparison have the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so they should offer identical operating system features.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy M30s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a larger amount of RAM. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy M30s, because it has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a quite better pixels number in each inch in the screen and a little bit bigger display.
The Galaxy M30s has a camera that's very similar to the camera in OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, although the Galaxy M30s has a smaller aperture which is worse for capturing pictures or video in poorly lited situations, a lower (4K) video resolution and a much worse 48 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy M30s, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy M30s features a much better battery life than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.