Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| -- | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 1.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note9 is better than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, getting an 87.1 score against 77. Galaxy Note9's body is somewhat heavier and thicker than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Note9, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has 6 GB more RAM memory.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has a little less pixels per inch in the display and a way lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a little bit larger screen. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a slightly bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits up to 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with a much longer battery performance than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G takes better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates and a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.