Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and Red |
| Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 1.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a general score of 85.5, which is much better than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G's global score of 77. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 design is just a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a just a little higher pixels density, a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, a bit larger screen and way more brightness.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a much greater storage for apps and games than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, and although they both have equal 256 GB internal storage, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a little bit better processing power than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a superior battery lifetime than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a much better camera than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also counts with a bigger aperture to take better captures in low-light situations and a camera in the back with a much higher 64 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.