Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 13 | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 0000-00-00 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black, Green, Purple, Red, White and Yellow |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3110mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 11 is better than OSCAL Tiger 12, getting an 83.3 score against 71.5. The Apple iPhone 11 body has the same thickness than OSCAL Tiger 12, but it is a little lighter. Apple iPhone 11 works with iOS 15.x OS, while OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with Android 13 OS. OSCAL Tiger 12 features an incredibly better looking screen than iPhone 11, because it has a little bit better display pixel density, a little larger display, much more display brightness and a higher resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels.
OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a much greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than iPhone 11, because it has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB and more internal memory capacity. IPhone 11 has a better CPU than OSCAL Tiger 12, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
The Apple iPhone 11 counts with a superior camera than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a way worse 12 megapixels resolution back facing camera. OSCAL Tiger 12 has a really longer battery performance than Apple iPhone 11, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3110mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.