Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 13 | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 0000-00-00 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has an overall score of 85.3, which is much better than the OSCAL Tiger 12's score of 71.5. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max is a somewhat heavier but a bit thinner phone than the OSCAL Tiger 12. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has iOS 15.x OS, and OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with Android 13 OS.
OSCAL Tiger 12 has a much better display than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels and a little bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with way more brightness and a little larger screen. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a better performing processor than OSCAL Tiger 12, because although it has a lower number of cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
OSCAL Tiger 12 has a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has more internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that allows up to 1 TB. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max captures much better photographs and videos than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a lot worse 12 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 features better battery duration than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.