Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 13 | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 0000-00-00 | 2020-04-24 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black, Red and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 399.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone SE (2020) has a general score of 81.5, which is better than OSCAL Tiger 12's score of 71.5. Apple iPhone SE (2020)'s construction is a lot lighter and thinner than OSCAL Tiger 12. Apple iPhone SE (2020) works with iOS 15.x OS, and OSCAL Tiger 12 works with Android 13 OS. The OSCAL Tiger 12 features a much better looking screen than Apple iPhone SE (2020), because it has a just a little higher pixel amount in each screen inch, much more brightness, a way larger screen and a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels.
OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a much better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone SE (2020), because it has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1 TB and more internal memory capacity. The Apple iPhone SE (2020) features a better performance than OSCAL Tiger 12, because although it has 5 GB lesser RAM and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
The Apple iPhone SE (2020) takes better pictures and videos than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a back camera with way less mega pixels. The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a much longer battery duration than iPhone SE (2020), because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.