Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 0000-00-00 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone X has a general score of 88.1, which is way better than the OSCAL Tiger 12's overall score of 71.5. The iPhone X design is a little thinner and somewhat lighter than the OSCAL Tiger 12. The OSCAL Tiger 12 has a brighter display than iPhone X, because although it has a quite worse pixel count in each inch in the display and a bit worse 1080 x 2460 resolution, it also counts with a much brighter display and a larger screen.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 has more storage to store more games and applications than iPhone X, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1 TB. IPhone X counts with a bit superior processing unit than OSCAL Tiger 12, because although it has 5 GB lesser RAM and lesser processing cores , it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Apple iPhone X, because it has an 84 percent bigger battery capacity. The iPhone X takes much better photos and videos than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a lot worse 12 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.