Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 0000-00-00 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone XR has a score of 82, which is much better than OSCAL Tiger 12's score of 71.5. IPhone XR is a a little bit lighter phone than OSCAL Tiger 12, but both of them have the same thickness. The OSCAL Tiger 12 features an incredibly better screen than iPhone XR, because it has a bit larger screen, a just a bit better number of pixels in each screen inch, a way brighter screen and a higher resolution of 1080 x 2460px.
OSCAL Tiger 12 has a very superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone XR, because it has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The iPhone XR counts with a faster CPU than OSCAL Tiger 12, because although it has an inferior number of cores and lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
IPhone XR shoots much clearer photos and videos than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a way less megapixels resolution back camera. OSCAL Tiger 12 has a much longer battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.