Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 0000-00-00 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone XS has a score of 84.2, which is better than the OSCAL Tiger 12's 71.5 score. The iPhone XS design is somewhat lighter and a bit thinner than the OSCAL Tiger 12. IPhone XS features a quite better performance than OSCAL Tiger 12, because although it has 4 GB lesser RAM and less cpu cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
OSCAL Tiger 12 features a brighter screen than Apple iPhone XS, because although it has a little worse pixels density and a little worse 1080 x 2460 pixels resolution, it also counts with a lot brighter screen and a larger screen. The iPhone XS counts with a much better camera than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a back camera with a way worse 12 mega-pixels resolution.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 features a much greater memory to install applications and games than iPhone XS, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that allows up to 1 TB. The OSCAL Tiger 12 features a superior battery lifetime than iPhone XS, because it has an 88% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.