Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 0000-00-00 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black, Gray and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel has an overall score of 80.2, which is better than the OSCAL Tiger 12's global score of 71.5. The Google Pixel body is noticeably lighter but just a little bit thicker than OSCAL Tiger 12. The OSCAL Tiger 12 has a bit better processing unit than Google Pixel, because it has more RAM and a greater number of faster cores.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a way better looking display than Google Pixel, because although it has a little bit lower display density, it also counts with a really larger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels. The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a much bigger storage to install games and applications than Google Pixel, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
Google Pixel has a better camera than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a lot less mega pixels resolution back camera. OSCAL Tiger 12 features a way better battery lifetime than Google Pixel, because it has an 81 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.