Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 0000-00-00 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL has a score of 82.5, which is better than the OSCAL Tiger 12's overall score of 71.5. Google Pixel 2 XL's design is just a bit thinner and lighter than OSCAL Tiger 12. OSCAL Tiger 12 and Google Pixel 2 XL both count with very similar CPUs, and although the Google Pixel 2 XL has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 features a much more vibrant display than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a lot worse display density and a way lower resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels, it also counts with a bit larger display. OSCAL Tiger 12 has much more memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
The Google Pixel 2 XL has a better camera than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a camera in the back with a lot lower 12.2 mega pixels resolution. The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a much longer battery life than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3520mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.