Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 0000-00-00 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a has an overall score of 78.8, which is much better than OSCAL Tiger 12's global score of 71.5. Both phones we are comparing here come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Google Pixel 3a has the older 11 version while OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13 version. Google Pixel 3a's construction is a little thinner and much lighter than the OSCAL Tiger 12.
OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a much more vibrant display than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a bit worse amount of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a larger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2460 pixels resolution. The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
OSCAL Tiger 12 has a much greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. Google Pixel 3a shoots much better photos and videos than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a way less megapixels resolution camera in the back.
OSCAL Tiger 12 features a way better battery duration than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.