Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 0000-00-00 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a XL has an overall score of 78.9, which is better than the OSCAL Tiger 12's 71.5 score. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS, but the Google Pixel 3a XL has an older 11 version while OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13. The Google Pixel 3a XL is a a bit thinner and lighter cellphone than OSCAL Tiger 12.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with an incredibly better screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2460px and a little bit larger display. OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with just a little better processing power than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has more RAM.
The Google Pixel 3a XL captures better photos and videos than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a camera in the back with way less mega pixels resolution. The OSCAL Tiger 12 features a very superior storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has more internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1 TB.
OSCAL Tiger 12 features greater battery duration than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.