Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 0000-00-00 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is much better than OSCAL Tiger 12, getting an 81.9 score against 71.5. Google Pixel 4's design is lighter and just a little bit thinner than OSCAL Tiger 12. The Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit better processing unit than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a way better screen than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a little lower screen density, it also counts with a bigger screen and a little bit higher 1080 x 2460px resolution. OSCAL Tiger 12 has a very superior memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
The Google Pixel 4 takes much clearer pictures and videos than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a back facing camera with a much lower resolution. OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a superior battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.