Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Just black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a has a general score of 82.9, which is much better than OSCAL Tiger 12's 71.5 general score. The Google Pixel 4a is a just a little thinner and incredibly lighter cellphone than the OSCAL Tiger 12. Both phones in this comparison come with Android operating system, but the Google Pixel 4a has 11 version while OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13.
OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a lot better looking display than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a quite lower screen pixel density, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels and a larger display. The Google Pixel 4a has a processor that's just as good as the processing unit in OSCAL Tiger 12, and although the Google Pixel 4a has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 has much more memory for apps and games than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have equal internal memory, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Google Pixel 4a captures much better pictures and videos than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a lot less megapixels back camera.
OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a much better battery performance than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3140mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.