Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 13 | Android 11 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Clearly white and Just black |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G is much better than the OSCAL Tiger 12, getting a overall score of 87.5 against 71.5. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Google Pixel 4a 5G has the previous 11 version while OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13 version. The Google Pixel 4a 5G is a lighter and just a bit thinner cellphone than OSCAL Tiger 12.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a little bit better performance than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The OSCAL Tiger 12 has a lot better looking display than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a just a little worse pixels density, it also counts with a little bit bigger display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2460 resolution.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 has a superior storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1 TB. Google Pixel 4a 5G takes better pictures and videos than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a way lower resolution back camera.
OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with improved battery performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.