| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 0000-00-00 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Just black and Sorta sage |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
The Google Pixel 5 is much better than OSCAL Tiger 12, getting an 89 score against 71.5. The Google Pixel 5 design is way lighter and a little bit thinner than OSCAL Tiger 12. Google Pixel 5 has a bit better processing power than OSCAL Tiger 12. Both have 8 GB of RAM and the same number of cores. The OSCAL Tiger 12 features a way better looking display than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a little bit worse number of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a little bit larger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2460.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 has a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have the same internal memory, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB. OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with better battery duration than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4080mAh.
Google Pixel 5 counts with a superior camera than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a lot lower 12.2 mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.