Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 0000-00-00 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Just black and Sorta sage |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is much better than OSCAL Tiger 12, getting an 89 score against 71.5. The Google Pixel 5 design is way lighter and a little bit thinner than OSCAL Tiger 12. Google Pixel 5 has a bit better processing power than OSCAL Tiger 12. Both have 8 GB of RAM and the same number of cores. The OSCAL Tiger 12 features a way better looking display than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a little bit worse number of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a little bit larger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2460.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 has a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have the same internal memory, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB. OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with better battery duration than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4080mAh.
Google Pixel 5 counts with a superior camera than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a lot lower 12.2 mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.