Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 0000-00-00 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
HTC U Ultra has a score of 77, which is slightly better than OSCAL Tiger 12's 71.5 overall score. The HTC U Ultra is a somewhat lighter and just a little thinner device than the OSCAL Tiger 12. OSCAL Tiger 12 has a much better looking display than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a little worse pixels density and a bit lower 1080 x 2460px resolution, it also counts with a bigger screen.
OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a bit better performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a higher number of cores (and faster). HTC U Ultra shoots much clearer photographs and videos than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a much less mega pixels resolution back-facing camera. OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a little bit better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC U Ultra, because although it has an external memory card slot that holds up to 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
OSCAL Tiger 12 has a way better battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.