Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 13 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 0000-00-00 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G7 ThinQ has a general score of 81, which is better than the OSCAL Tiger 12's 71.5 global score. LG G7 ThinQ's body is lighter and a bit thinner than the OSCAL Tiger 12. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but the LG G7 ThinQ has a newer 9.0 Pie version while OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13, giving you some nice extra features and optimized performance.
The LG G7 ThinQ has a bit better hardware performance than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. OSCAL Tiger 12 features a bit more vivid screen than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2460 and a much worse screen density, it also counts with a way brighter screen and a little bigger screen.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with slightly more memory capacity to store more games and applications than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a SD extension slot that allows up to 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The LG G7 ThinQ features a superior camera than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a much less mega-pixels resolution back camera.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a very superior battery lifetime than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.