Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 13 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 0000-00-00 | 2019-04-11 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 215.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G8 ThinQ is much better than OSCAL Tiger 12, having an 84.3 score against 71.5. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but LG G8 ThinQ has the newer 9.0 Pie version and OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13 version, so it provides you lots of additional features. The LG G8 ThinQ is a lighter cellphone than the OSCAL Tiger 12, but both of them are equally thin.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a sharper screen than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has a lot worse pixel density and a way worse 1080 x 2460px resolution, it also counts with a bit larger display and a way brighter screen. LG G8 ThinQ counts with a little faster processing unit than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
LG G8 ThinQ has a better camera than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a camera in the back with way less megapixels. LG G8 ThinQ features more memory to install applications and games than OSCAL Tiger 12, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG G8 ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB.
OSCAL Tiger 12 has a superior battery life than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.