Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 13 | Android 7.0 Nougat |
| 0000-00-00 | 2017-07-21 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.87 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.15 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Gray |
| -- | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Q8 is just a bit better than OSCAL Tiger 12, getting a global score of 77.2 against 71.5. The LG Q8 design is a little thinner and a lot lighter than OSCAL Tiger 12. These devices include Android OS, but LG Q8 has newer 7.0 Nougat version while OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13. OSCAL Tiger 12 has a much better looking screen than LG Q8, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2460px and a lot lower screen pixel density, it also counts with a way brighter screen and a way bigger screen.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a superior storage capacity for games and applications than LG Q8, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity. The OSCAL Tiger 12 features a little faster CPU than LG Q8, because it has 4 GB more RAM and 4 more CPU cores.
The LG Q8 has a superior camera than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a back-facing camera with way less mega pixels. OSCAL Tiger 12 features a superior battery duration than LG Q8, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.