Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 13 | Android 10 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ has a global score of 81.2, which is much better than the OSCAL Tiger 12's overall score of 71.5. The LG V40 ThinQ construction is just a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter than OSCAL Tiger 12. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V40 ThinQ has the older 10 version and OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13 version.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a way better screen than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a way worse 1080 x 2460px resolution and way less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a little bigger display. The LG V40 ThinQ features a bit better processing unit than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 features a little bit more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has an external memory slot that allows 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The OSCAL Tiger 12 features a much better battery performance than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 52% larger battery capacity.
LG V40 ThinQ captures much better pictures and videos than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a back facing camera with lot less mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.