Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 13 | Android 10 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola edge is much better than OSCAL Tiger 12, having an 89.6 score against 71.5. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola edge has the older 10 version and OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13 version. The Motorola edge body is somewhat thicker but a little lighter than the OSCAL Tiger 12.
The Motorola edge features a little faster CPU than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a lot better looking screen than Motorola edge, because it has a just a bit more pixels per inch of display, a little bit bigger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2460 resolution.
The Motorola edge shoots much better pictures and videos than OSCAL Tiger 12. Both have a camera in the back with a 64 megapixels. Motorola edge has a superior memory for apps and games than OSCAL Tiger 12, because although it has an external SD slot that supports up to 1000 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 128 GB more internal memory.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 features a little better battery life than Motorola edge, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.