Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 13 | Android 11 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| -- | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.69 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Moto G200 5G has an overall score of 86.2, which is much better than the OSCAL Tiger 12's score of 71.5. Although it's the best in this comparison review, Moto G200 5G is a just a little thicker and a little bit heavier phone than the OSCAL Tiger 12. These phones come with Android operating system, but Moto G200 5G has 11 version while OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 features an incredibly better display than Moto G200 5G. Both of them have an equal 1080 x 2460px resolution, a higher pixel amount in each inch in the screen and a same size screen. The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a much better storage for games and applications than Moto G200 5G, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has a SD extension slot that allows up to 1 TB.
Motorola Moto G200 5G features just a bit better performance than OSCAL Tiger 12. Both have a Octa-Core CPU and a 8 GB RAM. Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with a way better camera than OSCAL Tiger 12, because it has a back facing camera with lot more MP. The OSCAL Tiger 12 and the Motorola Moto G200 5G count with similar battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.