Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 0000-00-00 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Blue and Brown |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Vision is better than the OSCAL Tiger 12, having a overall score of 80.7 against 71.5. Motorola One Vision's construction is a bit lighter but just a little thicker than OSCAL Tiger 12. The OSCAL Tiger 12 has a way better looking display than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2460 pixels resolution and a just a bit lower display density, it also counts with a little bit bigger display.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 features just a bit better processing power than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has 4 GB more RAM. The Motorola One Vision shoots greater photos and videos than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a camera with a way worse 48 megapixels resolution.
OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a bit more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The OSCAL Tiger 12 has a really longer battery life than Motorola One Vision, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.