Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Android 13 | Android 10 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2020-11-12 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Meteor grey |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia 8 V 5G UW is much better than OSCAL Tiger 12, with a overall score of 80.3 against 71.5. Despite being the best we compare here, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW body is a little bit thicker and heavier than the OSCAL Tiger 12. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but Nokia 8 V 5G UW has the older 10 version and OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a way better screen than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, and although they both have a same size screen, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has a quite better 1080 x 2460 resolution and a little bit better screen density. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW's CPU is very similar to the processing unit in OSCAL Tiger 12, and although the Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 has a quite bigger storage to install games and applications than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because it has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The OSCAL Tiger 12 has a bit superior battery life than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because it has an 11% bigger battery size.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW features a lot better camera than OSCAL Tiger 12. They have the same resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.