Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Android 13 | Android 11 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.69 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Nokia XR20 is much better than OSCAL Tiger 12, having an 80.8 score against 71.5. These devices work with Android operating system, but Nokia XR20 has the previous 11 version while OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13 version. The Nokia XR20 is a extremely thicker and noticeably heavier device than OSCAL Tiger 12.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a much more vibrant screen than Nokia XR20, because it has a slightly higher 1080 x 2460 resolution, much more brightness, a quite better number of pixels in each screen inch and a little bit bigger display. The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a little bit better storage capacity to install applications and games than Nokia XR20, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has a SD card slot that allows up to 1 TB.
OSCAL Tiger 12 features a little better performance than Nokia XR20, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The OSCAL Tiger 12 features just a bit better battery lifetime than Nokia XR20, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4630mAh.
The Nokia XR20 takes way better pictures and videos than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a much lower 48 mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.