Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 12, 11 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2021-12-03 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.69 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A13 5G is much better than OSCAL Tiger 12, having a score of 82.1 against 71.5. Both phones we are comparing here work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy A13 5G has older 12 version while OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13. The Galaxy A13 5G body is just a bit lighter but just a little bit thicker than the OSCAL Tiger 12.
OSCAL Tiger 12 has a way better looking display than Galaxy A13 5G, because it has a little bit larger screen, a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2460 and a higher screen pixel density. OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a superior memory to install games and applications than Galaxy A13 5G, because it has 128 GB internal storage and an external SD slot that allows up to 1 TB.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy A13 5G features a battery lifetime that is just as good as OSCAL Tiger 12's battery life. Galaxy A13 5G takes much clearer videos and photos than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a camera with lot less mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.