Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 0000-00-00 | 2019-03-02 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.69 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A30 has an overall score of 79.6, which is much better than OSCAL Tiger 12's 71.5 overall score. Samsung Galaxy A30's body is somewhat lighter and a little bit thinner than OSCAL Tiger 12. The OSCAL Tiger 12 has a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A30, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 features a much more vibrant display than Galaxy A30, because although it has a quite inferior quantity of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a little larger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2460 resolution. OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a very superior memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A30, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and a SD extension slot that supports up to 1 TB.
OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with superior battery duration than Galaxy A30, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery size. The Galaxy A30 features a bit better camera than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a lot less MP resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.