Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 10 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.69 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A31 has a score of 81.3, which is much better than OSCAL Tiger 12's overall score of 71.5. These phones include Android operating system, but Galaxy A31 has 10 version and OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13. The Galaxy A31 body is a bit thicker but just a little bit lighter than OSCAL Tiger 12.
OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A31, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has a higher amount of RAM. The OSCAL Tiger 12 has a much better screen than Galaxy A31, because although it has a quite worse pixel count in each inch in the screen, it also counts with a bit bigger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy A31 takes a lot better videos and photos than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a back-facing camera with way less megapixels. The OSCAL Tiger 12 has a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A31, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB and more internal storage capacity.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 and the Galaxy A31 have similar battery durations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.