Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 12 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2022-04-22 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.29 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | -- |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 7.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| 8.69 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A33 5G is a bit better than the OSCAL Tiger 12, having a 77.8 score against 71.5. The Galaxy A33 5G design is just a bit thinner and just a little lighter than the OSCAL Tiger 12. Both phones in this review have Android OS, but the Galaxy A33 5G has an older 12 version and OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13 version.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a lot better screen than Galaxy A33 5G, because although it has a little worse display pixel density, it also counts with a little larger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2460. The OSCAL Tiger 12 and the Galaxy A33 5G both have incredibly similar storage for apps and games, they have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that supports up to 1 TB.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 has an extremely better CPU than Galaxy A33 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has a larger amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A33 5G has a battery life that is very similar to the battery performance in OSCAL Tiger 12. Galaxy A33 5G features a slightly better camera than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a camera with a way lower resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.