Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 13 |
| 0000-00-00 | -- |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 6.99 ounces | -- |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 8.69 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A34 has a global score of 82.9, which is better than OSCAL Tiger 12's 71.5 general score. Galaxy A34 is a a lot lighter and noticeably thinner cellphone than the OSCAL Tiger 12. Both phones in this review work with the same Android 13 OS (operating system). The OSCAL Tiger 12 features a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy A34, because although it has a quite worse amount of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2460px resolution and a little bigger display.
Samsung Galaxy A34 has a little better hardware performance than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with much more memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A34, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy A34 features a superior camera than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a camera in the back with a lot worse resolution. The Galaxy A34 counts with a battery performance that's just as good as the OSCAL Tiger 12 one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.