Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 0000-00-00 | 2019-04-10 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 4.94 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.9 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 437 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Exynos 7904 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.69 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A40 is much better than the OSCAL Tiger 12, with a global score of 79.6 against 71.5. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A40 has the previous 11 version and OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13 version. Galaxy A40's body is a lot lighter and a little bit thinner than the OSCAL Tiger 12.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with an incredibly better screen than Galaxy A40, because although it has a just a little lower number of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2460px resolution and a bigger screen. OSCAL Tiger 12 features a little bit better processing power than Galaxy A40, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has 4 GB more RAM.
OSCAL Tiger 12 features a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A40, because it has more internal memory capacity and an external memory card slot that supports up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A40 has a little bit better camera than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a back camera with a much worse 16 mega-pixels resolution.
OSCAL Tiger 12 features a really longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A40, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.