Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.47 x 2.99 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Prism Dot black, Prism Dot grey and Prism Dot white |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A42 is a lot better than the OSCAL Tiger 12, having a general score of 87 against 71.5. The Samsung Galaxy A42 body is just a bit thicker but a little bit lighter than OSCAL Tiger 12. Both of these devices use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A42 has older 11 version and OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13 version.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with an incredibly better looking display than Galaxy A42, because it has a way higher 1080 x 2460 pixels resolution, a greater pixel amount in each inch in the display and a quite larger display. The OSCAL Tiger 12 has just a bit more storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A42, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1 TB.
OSCAL Tiger 12 features a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A42, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A42 captures much better photographs and videos than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a back camera with lot less mega pixels resolution.
Galaxy A42's battery life is very similar to the OSCAL Tiger 12 one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.