Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 0000-00-00 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s has a global score of 86.6, which is much better than the OSCAL Tiger 12's general score of 71.5. Galaxy A50s is a lighter and a little bit thinner phone than the OSCAL Tiger 12. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A50s has an older 10 version and OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13 version.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 has a much more vibrant display than Galaxy A50s, because although it has a just a bit inferior number of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a bit larger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2460 resolution. OSCAL Tiger 12 has a bit more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy A50s features just a bit better performance than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. The OSCAL Tiger 12 has better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy A50s shoots greater photographs and videos than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a lot less megapixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.