Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Prism cube black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G is much better than OSCAL Tiger 12, getting a 90.8 score against 71.5. The Galaxy A51 5G body is a bit thicker but just a little bit lighter than the OSCAL Tiger 12. These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A51 5G has older 11 version and OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G and OSCAL Tiger 12 feature very similar processors, and although the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. OSCAL Tiger 12 features a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a just a bit inferior pixel number in each inch of display, it also counts with a bit bigger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels.
Galaxy A51 5G captures much clearer photos and videos than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a way lower resolution camera. OSCAL Tiger 12 features just a bit more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1 TB.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 features a little better battery life than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has an 11% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.