Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 12, 11 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a global score of 91.3, which is much better than OSCAL Tiger 12's 71.5 overall score. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has the older 12 version and OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a just a little bit lighter cellphone than the OSCAL Tiger 12, but both have the same thickness.
The Galaxy A52 5G's processing unit is just as good as the OSCAL Tiger 12 one, and although the Galaxy A52 5G has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a lot better display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a quite worse pixel quantity in each display inch, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2460 resolution and a little bigger screen.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a way better camera than OSCAL Tiger 12. They have the same resolution back camera. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with as much storage to install games and applications as OSCAL Tiger 12, both have equal internal storage and an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a bit longer battery life than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.