Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 11 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52s is a lot better than OSCAL Tiger 12, having a 91.1 score against 71.5. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A52s has an older 11 version while OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13 version. The Galaxy A52s is a a little bit lighter device than OSCAL Tiger 12, but they are equally thin.
OSCAL Tiger 12 features a much sharper display than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a little worse pixel amount per inch of display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2460 and a little bit bigger display. The Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with as much storage capacity for games and applications as the OSCAL Tiger 12, they have equal 128 GB internal memory and a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a bit more powerful processor than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. OSCAL Tiger 12 has a little better battery life than Galaxy A52s, because it has an 11% greater battery capacity. The Galaxy A52s has a greater camera than OSCAL Tiger 12. They have a 64 mega pixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.