Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 78.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 14 |
| 0000-00-00 | -- |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 6.99 ounces | -- |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | -- |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | -- |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.69 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored) is much better than the OSCAL Tiger 12, with a overall score of 78.7 against 71.5. Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored) is a much thinner and way lighter phone than the OSCAL Tiger 12. Both devices in this comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored) has the newer 14 version while OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13 version, counting with a couple nice extra features and improved performance.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a lot better looking display than Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored), because although it has a little bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2460 resolution and a little bigger screen. The OSCAL Tiger 12 features a superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored), and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
OSCAL Tiger 12 features a lot better hardware performance than Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored). They have 8 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processing unit. The Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored) counts with a battery lifetime that's very similar to the battery performance in OSCAL Tiger 12. The Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored) takes much clearer videos and photos than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a camera in the back with a much worse resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.