Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 0000-00-00 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| -- | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.69 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A6 is just a bit better than the OSCAL Tiger 12, having a 75.8 score against 71.5. The Samsung Galaxy A6 design is just a little bit thinner and lighter than the OSCAL Tiger 12. The OSCAL Tiger 12 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A6, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 has a lot better display than Galaxy A6, because it has more pixels per inch of screen, a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2460 and a larger display. The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a much bigger storage for apps and games than Galaxy A6, because it has 96 GB more internal memory and an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 has a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy A6, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. The Samsung Galaxy A6 has just a bit better camera than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a much lower resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.