Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 0000-00-00 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.69 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017) is just a bit better than the OSCAL Tiger 12, having a 75.8 score against 71.5. The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017) design is just a little bit thinner and a little bit lighter than OSCAL Tiger 12. OSCAL Tiger 12 has a bit better performance than Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has a larger amount of RAM.
OSCAL Tiger 12 features an incredibly better looking screen than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a quite higher screen pixel density, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2460px and a bigger screen. OSCAL Tiger 12 features much more memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has more internal memory and a SD memory slot that supports up to 1 TB.
Galaxy A7 (2017) counts with a little bit better camera than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a back facing camera with lot less mega pixels. OSCAL Tiger 12 has a really longer battery performance than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a 39 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.