Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 has a global score of 87.5, which is a lot better than the OSCAL Tiger 12's general score of 71.5. Samsung Galaxy A71 is a a bit lighter and a little bit thinner phone than the OSCAL Tiger 12. Both phones we compare here include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A71 has 11 version and OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a way better looking display than Galaxy A71, because it has a little bit better screen pixels density, a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2460px and a bit larger display. Samsung Galaxy A71 has a CPU that's very similar to the OSCAL Tiger 12 one, and although the Samsung Galaxy A71 has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 counts with a lot better camera than OSCAL Tiger 12. Both have a same resolution camera in the back. The OSCAL Tiger 12 features a little bit more storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy A71, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a little longer battery duration than Galaxy A71, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.