Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 0000-00-00 | 2018-01-06 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.87 x 2.78 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black, Blue, Gold and Orchid grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G71 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.69 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A8 (2018) has an overall score of 79.2, which is better than OSCAL Tiger 12's 71.5 general score. The Galaxy A8 (2018) design has the same thickness than the OSCAL Tiger 12, but it's somewhat lighter. OSCAL Tiger 12 features a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy A8 (2018), and although they both have the same number of cores, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 features an incredibly better screen than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), because although it has a little inferior count of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2460px and a bigger screen. The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has 64 GB more internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1 TB.
OSCAL Tiger 12 has a way better battery performance than Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has a 5000mAh battery size. The Galaxy A8 (2018) counts with just a bit better camera than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a much lower resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.