Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 0000-00-00 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.69 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has a global score of 85.2, which is better than OSCAL Tiger 12's overall score of 71.5. Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018)'s body is just a little bit thinner and just a little bit lighter than OSCAL Tiger 12. OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a slightly better 1080 x 2460 resolution, a just a bit higher display pixels density and a little bit larger screen.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 and the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) both count with extremely similar CPUs, and although the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Galaxy A9 (2018) captures much clearer photographs and videos than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a way lower resolution back facing camera.
OSCAL Tiger 12 features a little bit better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The OSCAL Tiger 12 has greater battery performance than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.