Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Alpha
AT&TSM-G850A
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 0000-00-00 | -- |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.21 x 2.58 x 0.26 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 4.06 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black, Blue, Gold, Gray and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 320.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 312 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 10.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 1860mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 11 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 3.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Alpha has a general score of 76.3, which is just a bit better than the OSCAL Tiger 12's 71.5 overall score. These phones include Android operating system, but Galaxy Alpha has 4.4.4 version and OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13. The Galaxy Alpha is a thinner and much lighter phone than the OSCAL Tiger 12.
OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a way better looking display than Galaxy Alpha, because it has a lot larger display, a higher amount of pixels per inch in the display and a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels. The Galaxy Alpha counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than OSCAL Tiger 12, because although it has less RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor.
OSCAL Tiger 12 features a way bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Alpha, because it has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1 TB and more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy Alpha counts with just a bit better camera than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a back-facing camera with a lot worse resolution.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 has a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Alpha, because it has a 169% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.