Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 0000-00-00 | 2016-06-01 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.17 x 3.04 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Metal |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.69 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy C7 is just a bit better than OSCAL Tiger 12, getting a global score of 77.7 against 71.5. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS, but the Galaxy C7 has 8.0 Oreo version while OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13 version, providing the user a lot of extra features and performance enhancements. The Galaxy C7 body is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than OSCAL Tiger 12.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy C7, because it has a larger screen, a little bit higher 1080 x 2460 resolution and a just a bit higher pixels density. OSCAL Tiger 12 features a little better processing power than Galaxy C7, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has 4 GB more RAM.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a way bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy C7, because it has a SD card slot that admits up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy C7, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
The Galaxy C7 shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a much less MP resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.