Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 12 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2022-03-22 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | -- |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Aqua Blue and Forest Green |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| 8.69 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F23 is better than OSCAL Tiger 12, having an 84.6 score against 71.5. These devices come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy F23 has older 12 version and OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13. The OSCAL Tiger 12 has a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy F23, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has more RAM memory.
OSCAL Tiger 12 has a much better looking screen than Galaxy F23, because although it has a little lower pixels density, it also counts with a little bit larger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2460 resolution. OSCAL Tiger 12 has a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy F23, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy F23 has a slightly better camera than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a camera with a lot lower 50 mega pixels resolution. The Galaxy F23's battery life is just as good as the battery lifetime in OSCAL Tiger 12.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.