Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2020-10-16 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F41 is much better than the OSCAL Tiger 12, having a global score of 85.2 against 71.5. The Galaxy F41 body is a little bit lighter but a little bit thicker than the OSCAL Tiger 12. Both devices in this review include Android OS, but Galaxy F41 has 11 version and OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 has a much better display than Galaxy F41, because although it has a bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels, a little larger display and much more brightness. The Samsung Galaxy F41 features just a little better hardware performance than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have 8 cores.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 features a lot bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy F41, because it has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB and more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy F41 captures a lot better photographs and videos than OSCAL Tiger 12. Both of them have a same resolution camera in the back.
Samsung Galaxy F41 features improved battery life than OSCAL Tiger 12, because it has a 20 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.