Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 0000-00-00 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold has a general score of 97.6, which is a lot better than the OSCAL Tiger 12's score of 71.5. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy Fold has newer 9.0 Pie version while OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13, so it provides some nice extra features and performance optimizations. The Galaxy Fold is a somewhat thinner but much heavier phone than OSCAL Tiger 12.
The Galaxy Fold counts with just a bit better performance than OSCAL Tiger 12, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Fold also has 4 GB more RAM. OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a much sharper display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2460 resolution, it also counts with a quite greater amount of pixels in each inch in the display.
Galaxy Fold counts with a better storage capacity to install games and applications than OSCAL Tiger 12, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a little better battery duration than Galaxy Fold, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4380mAh.
Galaxy Fold counts with a superior camera than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a back-facing camera with a lot lower resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.