Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 12 |
| 0000-00-00 | -- |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.51 x 3.03 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Blue, Brown and Green |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Octa-Core 2400 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| 8.69 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy M33 is a lot better than the OSCAL Tiger 12, with a score of 86.3 against 71.5. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but the Galaxy M33 has 12 version and OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13 version. The Galaxy M33 is a somewhat thicker but a little lighter cellphone than OSCAL Tiger 12. The OSCAL Tiger 12 has a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy M33, because although it has a just a little lower screen pixels density, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2460 and a little bigger screen.
Galaxy M33 features a bit better processor than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy M33 shoots a little bit better photos and videos than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a lot less MP back-facing camera. The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy M33, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy M33 and OSCAL Tiger 12 feature extremely similar battery durations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.